AI and the future of work
For good or bad – Unite needs to take control
Reading time: 4 min
On Wednesday morning the conference debated the issue of artificial intelligence (AI). The first, composite 5, was called ‘A workers’ future – automation and AI’ and the second, composite 6, discussed the ‘threats and opportunities of AI’.
Composite 5 called for a number of worker protections including supporting the draft TUC AI Bill, make representations to the Labour government as outlined in earlier policy, and to develop a national automation strategy within Unite.
The composite recognised we did not have the luxury of time and called for the Executive Council (EC) to support and resource the future of work through a series of measures. These included working with the government to ensure the legal right to consult with trade unions on the introduction of new technologies and AI into the workplace becomes law.
Moved by William Hodgson, North West, he said that “AI could realise some of our most sacred goals.” But with the rate of change that was happening that was not likely.
“The pace of change is dizzying. We don’t have the time. The only way we can effect change in the workplace is to engage with the employer.”
George White from the North West seconded. He said, “There’s not a single sector that’s insulated from the advance of AI. New technology could be our liberator – or our tyrant.”
Taken in tandem with Composite 5 was Composite 6 – on the ‘Threats and opportunities of AI.’ It recognised the profound influence of AI on our industries, workplaces and employment patterns.
It recognised the transforming effects in many sectors but acknowledged the significant risks including job displacement and deskilling, erosion of workers’ rights, safety and ethical concerns, lack of regulation and worker involvement.
The composite called for AI to be implemented in a way that benefitted members, enhanced job security, and maintained the highest standards of safety and ethics. In short – Unite must take a proactive stand in safeguarding employment while embracing technological change in the workplace.
The composite was moved by James Cotter, Ireland. He said, “We should embrace AI but take a watchful stand and put in place mechanisms to protect jobs, training for new jobs. We should engage with AI and engage with the process but it’s not an easy ask. The pace of change has never been seen in human history.
“We have to ask – where will the human fit in?” he continued. “How do we stay in control? What are these new jobs that will be created and can the new jobs be created at the same pace as AI is advancing?
“Let’s engage with AI, but let’s make AI work for the people.”
Aaron Harrison, Wales, seconded the composite. He said that beyond the potential job loss threat is a threat to workers’ rights. “Decisions must not be made behind closed doors – Unite must be involved. This composite provides a clear road map.”
John Robertson, a first-time speaker from Scotland supported composite 6. He said, “AI is here to stay and we need to be at the forefront. Numbers of new entry level jobs have dropped since the introduction of ChatGBT in 2023.
“Unite should campaign to protect workers’ rights against unscrupulous employers,” he added.
In his right of reply James Cotter said, “Opportunities only appear if you act.”
Both composites were carried.
By Amanda Campbell